Influence of Site Parameters on Fourier Amplification Application for 1D Linear Viscoelastic Method

Authors

  • Ahmed Boudghene Stambouli
    Affiliation
    Risk Assessment and Management Laboratory (RISAM), Faculty of Technology, University of Tlemcen, BP 230-13048, Tlemcen, Algeria
  • Djawad Zendagui
    Affiliation
    Risk Assessment and Management Laboratory (RISAM), Faculty of Technology, University of Tlemcen, BP 230-13048, Tlemcen, Algeria
  • Pierre-Yves Bard
    Affiliation
    Institut de Sciences de la Terre (ISTerre), Université Grenoble-Alpes, IFSTTAR, Maison des Géosciences, Bâtiment OSUG C, CS 40700, 38058 GRENOBLE Cedex 9, France
  • Hamza Dif
    Affiliation
    Risk Assessment and Management Laboratory (RISAM), Faculty of Technology, University of Tlemcen, BP 230-13048, Tlemcen, Algeria Département de Génie Civil, Université de Djelfa, Faculté de Technologie, BP 3117, Djelfa, Algeria
https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.12601

Abstract

We focus on the effect of site parameters, also called site proxies, on the variation of the amplification factor. This latter, named Fourier Amplification Factor (FAF) is defined as the ratio of the Fourier transform of the seismic motion at surface and at bedrock. For this study, the wave propagation theory is used limited to 1D linear viscoelastic domain. At this effect, a set of FAF, is established for a set of 858 real profiles. From there, the site parameters are also derived, it is necessary to mention that the FAF can be computed in independent manner of seismic signals which it is applicable only on linear domain.
In Nuclear Power Industry application, the FAF is mostly used and can be approximated by limited number of site proxies. As the usual code practice implies a lower number of site proxies (generally 1, sometimes 2) as UBC97 or EC8, a sensitivity analysis is conducted to identify the "best performing" site parameters. The results show that by far, using the six site proxies lead to a better prediction of FAF. However if we have to use one single site parameter, results show that the best one is the overall resonance frequency (f0). In the case when we intend to use two site parameters built from the average shear wave velocity over the upper 30 m (Vs30) and the resonance frequency (f0) which are preferred and give an important variance reduction superior than 61%. In the result, a new formula has been established.

Keywords:

1D linear site response, Fourier amplification factors, site proxies, neural network

Citation data from Crossref and Scopus

Published Online

2020-11-04

How to Cite

Boudghene Stambouli, A., Zendagui, D., Bard, P.-Y., Dif, H. “Influence of Site Parameters on Fourier Amplification Application for 1D Linear Viscoelastic Method”, Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 65(1), pp. 229–241, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.12601

Issue

Section

Research Article