A Comparative Study on Mortar Removal Methods and their Influence on Recycled Aggregate Properties

Authors

  • Jeonghyun Kim ORCID
    Affiliation

    Faculty of Civil Engineering, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, 50–370, Wrocław, Poland

  • Haneol Jang
    Affiliation

    Architecture Office 1, Seoul Metro, Hyoryeong-ro 5, 06693, Seoul, Republic of Korea

https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.19065

Abstract

The adhered mortar attached to recycled aggregate (RA) is one of the main causes of weakening the mechanical properties and durability performance of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC). Therefore, in order to improve the performance of RA and RAC, several methods have been proposed to remove the adhered mortar in RA. However, knowing the adhered mortar content is as important as removing it. This is because concrete mix designs considering the amount of adhered mortar have been proposed and better strength, durability and environmental benefits of these mix designs were reported compared to conventional RAC mix design. Therefore, in this study, the adhered mortar was removed by using two methods of ‘acid treatment’ and ‘chemical and mechanical stress treatment’ for three types of RA, and the test results obtained from each method were comparatively analyzed. The results showed that the adhered mortar contents determined by the two methods were different for the same aggregate, and neither allowed the complete removal of the adhered mortar from RA. It also showed that the test environment of the chemical-mechanical stress method can be harsh enough to damage the original aggregate in RA, and that the acid treatment can cause corrosion of RA depending on the type of aggregate.

Keywords:

mortar removal, adhered mortar, recycled aggregate, mortar removal treatment

Citation data from Crossref and Scopus

Published Online

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Kim, J., Jang, H. “A Comparative Study on Mortar Removal Methods and their Influence on Recycled Aggregate Properties”, Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 66(3), pp. 731–738, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.19065

Issue

Section

Research Article