Durability Indices of a Sealing Mortar Incorporating Blast Furnace Slag

Comparison with a Commercial Reference

Authors

  • Soumia Ikhaddalene
    Affiliation
    Laboratory of Applied Chemistry and Materials (LabCAM), Chemistry Departement, Faculty of Science, University of M'hamed Bougara of Boumerdes, Avenue de l'Indépendance, 35000 Boumerdes, Algeria
  • Amar Irekti
    Affiliation
    Laboratory of Applied Chemistry and Materials (LabCAM), Chemistry Departement, Faculty of Science, University of M'hamed Bougara of Boumerdes, Avenue de l'Indépendance, 35000 Boumerdes, Algeria
  • Mehena Oualit
    Affiliation
    Laboratory of Applied Chemistry and Materials (LabCAM), Chemistry Departement, Faculty of Science, University of M'hamed Bougara of Boumerdes, Avenue de l'Indépendance, 35000 Boumerdes, Algeria
https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.40555

Abstract

Ground granulated blast furnace slag generated from steel manufacturing presents environmental challenges, but it can be valuable when utilized as a supplementary material in concrete, contributing to the development of sustainable materials. In this research, a new sealing mortar was prepared by substituting 10% of the cement with slag (M10). This material can provide performance comparable to M234, a M0 sealer used for sealing and wedging supports and machine bases. The mechanical properties and durability indices of both M10 and M234 were compared to the reference mortar MISO, which is a laboratory-made mortar free of slag. XRD analysis was conducted to determine the crystallinity of the starting cement, and granulometry revealed a median size distribution of 23 μm for the slag after grinding. Capillary absorption and water-accessible porosity were tested for all samples.

Keywords:

sustainable material, substitution, sealing mortar, mechanical properties, durability

Citation data from Crossref and Scopus

Published Online

2025-10-30

How to Cite

Ikhaddalene, S., Irekti, A., Oualit, M. “Durability Indices of a Sealing Mortar Incorporating Blast Furnace Slag: Comparison with a Commercial Reference”, Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 69(4), pp. 1321–1332, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.40555

Issue

Section

Research Article