THE DOUBLE BOND OF THE ARCHITECT On the similarities and differences between architects´ and civil engineers´ design methods

Authors

  • Dénes Patonai

Abstract

The architect has a uniquely paradox role, as he is bound by the rational, material world - without which no plan could actually take form - while through his individuality he continually explores new, subjective means of expression for himself, his environment and his mentality. How can he express himself when material itself is only a tool for him, not the purpose of his work? How is he able to build a civilization that is in harmony with the natural world yet projects a definite contrast, all the while contesting the confines of economic feasibility? The article explores this double bond, calling attention to a key element that the architect uses during his creative and constructive process.

Keywords:

architecture and the architect - key differences, architectural design, as a means of expression for the architect, construction is rational, design is subjective, the importance of, architectural inspiration, architectural quality, build quality (the, structure itself) and quality of the idea (the structure´s intellectual, value), architectural space, the paradox of architecture

Citation data from Crossref and Scopus

How to Cite

Patonai, D. “THE DOUBLE BOND OF THE ARCHITECT On the similarities and differences between architects´ and civil engineers´ design methods”, Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 47(1), pp. 11–18, 2003.

Issue

Section

Research Article