Assessment Methods for Comparing Shared Mobility and Conventional Transportation Modes in Urban Areas

Authors

  • Simon Nagy
    Affiliation

    Department of Transport Technology and Economics, Faculty of Transportation Engineering and Vehicle Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Műegyetem rakpart 3, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary

  • Csaba Csiszár
    Affiliation

    Department of Transport Technology and Economics, Faculty of Transportation Engineering and Vehicle Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Műegyetem rakpart 3, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary

https://doi.org/10.3311/PPso.16605

Abstract

Shared mobility is an innovative and sustainable approach to passenger transportation, which has only recently emerged. In urban areas car-sharing, bike-sharing and other special vehicles (e.g., scooters) are popular. For greater distances, ridesharing is considered as a great option beside own private car usage or public transportation. We elaborated an assessment to analyse mobility modes. The research consists of two main parts. First, a wide spectrum of key variables is identified. We classified the variables among the following indicators: flexibility, comfort, and dynamic characteristics. These indicators support mode choice decisions. The second part is the model of service level. In the model, we included parameters to represent the importance of certain attributes. The model can be used to support mode choice decisions. We applied the method to analyse a simple urban mobility palette and place shared mobility within it. We found that shared mobility modes can be placed between private car usage and public transportation according to the aggregated indicators.

Keywords:

shared mobility, flexibility, comfort, travel chain, assessment method, analysis

Citation data from Crossref and Scopus

Published Online

2022-06-14

How to Cite

Nagy, S., Csiszár, C. (2022) “Assessment Methods for Comparing Shared Mobility and Conventional Transportation Modes in Urban Areas”, Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 30(2), pp. 158–166. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPso.16605

Issue

Section

Articles