BAD ARGUMENTS AGAINST A GOOD CASE (Laudan'a attacks on the strong programme)
Abstract
The paper deals with L. Laudan's attack on the symmetry thesis of Bloor's strong programme. It will be shown that Laudan's argumentation is fallacious and therefore his attempt at refuting the symmetry thesis has failed.
Keywords:
sociology of knowledge, strong programme, symmetry thesis, scientific rationalityHow to Cite
Fehér, M. (1996) “BAD ARGUMENTS AGAINST A GOOD CASE (Laudan’a attacks on the strong programme)”, Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 4(2), pp. 169–174.
Issue
Section
Articles