BAD ARGUMENTS AGAINST A GOOD CASE (Laudan'a attacks on the strong programme)

Authors

  • Márta Fehér

Abstract

The paper deals with L. Laudan's attack on the symmetry thesis of Bloor's strong programme. It will be shown that Laudan's argumentation is fallacious and therefore his attempt at refuting the symmetry thesis has failed.

Keywords:

sociology of knowledge, strong programme, symmetry thesis, scientific rationality

Citation data from Crossref and Scopus

How to Cite

Fehér, M. (1996) “BAD ARGUMENTS AGAINST A GOOD CASE (Laudan’a attacks on the strong programme)”, Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 4(2), pp. 169–174.

Issue

Section

Articles