Demographic Analysis of Active Transport Mode Users in Urban Context

Authors

  • Ahmed Jaber
    Affiliation
    Department of Transport Technology and Economics, Faculty of Transportation Engineering and Vehicle Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Műegyetem rkp. 3., H-1111 Budapest, Hungary
  • Jamil Hamadneh
    Affiliation
    Department of Civil Engineering and Sustainable Structures, Palestine Technical University-Kadoorie, Yafa Street, 7., Tulkarem, Palestine
https://doi.org/10.3311/PPtr.23401

Abstract

Active transportation, such as walking, cycling, and micro-mobility modes, has received a lot of attention in recent years due to its potential benefits to urban residents, such as less traffic, better air quality, more opportunities to get exercise, and an overall higher quality of life. In this study, we used Classification and Regression Trees (CART) to compare and contrast three mobility options: shared micro-mobility, private micro-mobility, and walking. We surveyed 219 people living in Budapest, Hungary, to learn more about their travel habits and investigate the demographic elements that influence people's mode choice, such as age, gender, ownership of micro-mobility vehicles, education, job, and income. Results showed that ownership of personal micro-mobility vehicles, and age as important predictors of active travel mode choice. Men seem to consider cost and weather conditions when choosing shared micromobility modes, while women value safety and weather conditions. Our findings can guide policy decisions and urban planning initiatives by identifying the most significant predictors of mode choice and evaluating the possible benefits and drawbacks of each mode.

Keywords:

active travel, mode choice, micro-mobility, shared mobility, walking

Citation data from Crossref and Scopus

Published Online

2024-06-21

How to Cite

Jaber, A., Hamadneh, J. (2024) “Demographic Analysis of Active Transport Mode Users in Urban Context”, Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, 52(4), pp. 326–332. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPtr.23401

Issue

Section

Articles